Fake Moon
Claim: The Moon is not a natural celestial body, but rather an artificial construct, hologram, or deception.
Bullshit Meter
Pure ontological fiction, excluding real psychological effects.
Physics vs. mind loop
Does it work in the physical world, or only through belief and behaviour?
Neither physically real nor a meaningful psychological loop.
Bio & cult hazard
29.1%Risk of abandoning medicine and of getting trapped in a closed group.
Topological fingerprint
The structural profile of the claim on five axes.
- Empirical rigor
- 5.0%
- Magic & dogma
- 35.2%
- Rhetorical fog
- 35.9%
- Conspiracy
- 86.7%
- Psychosocial
- 4.5%
Ockham's guillotine
What remains after cutting away the unfalsifiable superstructure.
Scam & grift
0.4%How much it works as a money-extraction funnel.
Fog & Barnum
57.3%Protection from refutation through vagueness and stolen jargon.
Energy, frequency, vibration, quantum alignment, natural harmony, ancient wisdom, holistic balance…
- Barnum effect32.1%
- Motte-and-bailey35.4%
- Stolen jargon29.1%
Guru roulette
Does the result depend on who performs it?
Not applicable
Fossil & dogma clock
98.4%Does the field correct its errors, or is it frozen?
- 🚀Active science2.3%
- 🩹Degenerative patching63.5%
- 🎭Marketing chameleon26.1%
- 🦴Fossil in amber8.0%
Tin-foil hat reactor
84.0%How big a global conspiracy the claim needs.
Paranoia level 5/5 · Every agency, satellite and university