GMOs Are Dangerous

Claim: Consuming genetically modified foods poses severe and inherent dangers to human health.

CONSPIRACY FICTION Worldwide#gmo#food safety#biotechnology
Compare

Bullshit Meter

Pure ontological fiction, excluding real psychological effects.

63.8%
Hard empirical modelHeuristicHybrid pseudosciencePure fiction

Physics vs. mind loop

Does it work in the physical world, or only through belief and behaviour?

Physical world47.6%
Mind & behaviour4.9%

Neither physically real nor a meaningful psychological loop.

Bio & cult hazard

87.5%

Risk of abandoning medicine and of getting trapped in a closed group.

☣ Medical risk87.5%
🔒 Cult isolation3.3%

Topological fingerprint

The structural profile of the claim on five axes.

Empirical rigorMagic & dogmaRhetorical fogConspiracyPsychosocial
Empirical rigor
32.6%
Magic & dogma
20.3%
Rhetorical fog
30.7%
Conspiracy
72.1%
Psychosocial
6.1%
Compare with

Ockham's guillotine

What remains after cutting away the unfalsifiable superstructure.

Hard core2.6%
Common sense4.3%
Pure ritual6.1%
Empty negation87.0%

Scam & grift

0.2%

How much it works as a money-extraction funnel.

1. Bait0.8%
2. Guru dependence7.0%
3. Blaming the client0.8%

Fog & Barnum

47.4%

Protection from refutation through vagueness and stolen jargon.

Energy, frequency, vibration, quantum alignment, natural harmony, ancient wisdom, holistic balance…

  • Barnum effect35.9%
  • Motte-and-bailey35.9%
  • Stolen jargon14.1%

Guru roulette

Does the result depend on who performs it?

Not applicable

Fossil & dogma clock

94.0%

Does the field correct its errors, or is it frozen?

  1. 🚀Active science6.0%
  2. 🩹Degenerative patching29.3%
  3. 🎭Marketing chameleon58.6%
  4. 🦴Fossil in amber6.0%

Tin-foil hat reactor

67.1%

How big a global conspiracy the claim needs.

12345

Paranoia level 4/5 · Governments and science