Ouija Board

Claim: Ouija boards enable communication with spirits, ghosts, or other supernatural entities.

COMMERCIAL QUACKERY Worldwide#ouija#spiritualism#paranormal
Compare

Bullshit Meter

Pure ontological fiction, excluding real psychological effects.

90.7%
Hard empirical modelHeuristicHybrid pseudosciencePure fiction

Physics vs. mind loop

Does it work in the physical world, or only through belief and behaviour?

Physical world0.7%
Mind & behaviour19.5%

Neither physically real nor a meaningful psychological loop.

Bio & cult hazard

18.6%

Risk of abandoning medicine and of getting trapped in a closed group.

☣ Medical risk14.8%
🔒 Cult isolation22.1%

Topological fingerprint

The structural profile of the claim on five axes.

Empirical rigorMagic & dogmaRhetorical fogConspiracyPsychosocial
Empirical rigor
2.0%
Magic & dogma
56.4%
Rhetorical fog
46.8%
Conspiracy
2.2%
Psychosocial
11.0%
Compare with

Ockham's guillotine

What remains after cutting away the unfalsifiable superstructure.

Hard core0.2%
Common sense1.3%
Pure ritual95.9%
Empty negation2.6%

Scam & grift

49.9%

How much it works as a money-extraction funnel.

1. Bait56.0%
2. Guru dependence49.9%
3. Blaming the client45.3%

Fog & Barnum

63.1%

Protection from refutation through vagueness and stolen jargon.

Energy, frequency, vibration, quantum alignment, natural harmony, ancient wisdom, holistic balance…

  • Barnum effect46.9%
  • Motte-and-bailey42.5%
  • Stolen jargon6.5%

Guru roulette

96.2%

Does the result depend on who performs it?

☀☂⚡?☾

Repeatability between operators: 3.8%

  • Special gift needed49.9%
  • Contradicting experts27.6%
  • "Skeptics block it"18.6%

Fossil & dogma clock

98.6%

Does the field correct its errors, or is it frozen?

  1. 🚀Active science2.0%
  2. 🩹Degenerative patching36.0%
  3. 🎭Marketing chameleon29.5%
  4. 🦴Fossil in amber32.6%

Tin-foil hat reactor

2.1%

How big a global conspiracy the claim needs.

12345

Paranoia level 1/5 · No conspiracy needed