Microplastics Harm Human Health

Claim: Ingestion and inhalation of microplastics cause significant adverse effects on human health.

VERIFIED REALITY Worldwide#microplastics#toxicology#health
Compare

Bullshit Meter

Pure ontological fiction, excluding real psychological effects.

12.4%
Hard empirical modelHeuristicHybrid pseudosciencePure fiction

Physics vs. mind loop

Does it work in the physical world, or only through belief and behaviour?

Physical world91.0%
Mind & behaviour1.0%

Works physically, independent of belief.

Bio & cult hazard

25.9%

Risk of abandoning medicine and of getting trapped in a closed group.

☣ Medical risk25.9%
🔒 Cult isolation1.6%

Topological fingerprint

The structural profile of the claim on five axes.

Empirical rigorMagic & dogmaRhetorical fogConspiracyPsychosocial
Empirical rigor
84.5%
Magic & dogma
2.6%
Rhetorical fog
8.7%
Conspiracy
3.3%
Psychosocial
7.3%
Compare with

Ockham's guillotine

What remains after cutting away the unfalsifiable superstructure.

Hard core68.5%
Common sense19.9%
Pure ritual6.1%
Empty negation5.5%

Scam & grift

0.1%

How much it works as a money-extraction funnel.

1. Bait2.3%
2. Guru dependence3.1%
3. Blaming the client0.2%

Fog & Barnum

14.8%

Protection from refutation through vagueness and stolen jargon.

Energy, frequency, vibration, quantum alignment, natural harmony, ancient wisdom, holistic balance…

  • Barnum effect16.4%
  • Motte-and-bailey14.2%
  • Stolen jargon3.9%

Guru roulette

7.2%

Does the result depend on who performs it?

✓✓✓✓✓

Repeatability between operators: 92.8%

  • Special gift needed3.1%
  • Contradicting experts2.5%
  • "Skeptics block it"1.5%

Fossil & dogma clock

13.9%

Does the field correct its errors, or is it frozen?

  1. 🚀Active science81.3%
  2. 🩹Degenerative patching7.6%
  3. 🎭Marketing chameleon10.2%
  4. 🦴Fossil in amber0.9%

Tin-foil hat reactor

2.7%

How big a global conspiracy the claim needs.

12345

Paranoia level 1/5 · No conspiracy needed