Hypnosis for Weight Loss

Claim: Hypnosis effectively promotes significant and lasting weight loss by altering subconscious eating habits and cravings.

MIXED EVIDENCE Worldwide#hypnosis#weight-loss#hypnotherapy
Compare

Bullshit Meter

Pure ontological fiction, excluding real psychological effects.

52.9%
Hard empirical modelHeuristicHybrid pseudosciencePure fiction

Physics vs. mind loop

Does it work in the physical world, or only through belief and behaviour?

Physical world16.0%
Mind & behaviour34.3%

Neither physically real nor a meaningful psychological loop.

Bio & cult hazard

13.1%

Risk of abandoning medicine and of getting trapped in a closed group.

☣ Medical risk8.2%
🔒 Cult isolation17.2%

Topological fingerprint

The structural profile of the claim on five axes.

Empirical rigorMagic & dogmaRhetorical fogConspiracyPsychosocial
Empirical rigor
14.1%
Magic & dogma
35.5%
Rhetorical fog
33.3%
Conspiracy
1.2%
Psychosocial
48.2%
Compare with

Ockham's guillotine

What remains after cutting away the unfalsifiable superstructure.

Hard core7.4%
Common sense55.8%
Pure ritual35.8%
Empty negation1.0%

Scam & grift

24.9%

How much it works as a money-extraction funnel.

1. Bait83.3%
2. Guru dependence56.5%
3. Blaming the client55.5%

Fog & Barnum

49.6%

Protection from refutation through vagueness and stolen jargon.

Energy, frequency, vibration, quantum alignment, natural harmony, ancient wisdom, holistic balance…

  • Barnum effect34.6%
  • Motte-and-bailey42.1%
  • Stolen jargon6.8%

Guru roulette

80.9%

Does the result depend on who performs it?

☀☂⚡?☾

Repeatability between operators: 19.1%

  • Special gift needed56.5%
  • Contradicting experts23.2%
  • "Skeptics block it"1.3%

Fossil & dogma clock

94.7%

Does the field correct its errors, or is it frozen?

  1. 🚀Active science4.1%
  2. 🩹Degenerative patching47.8%
  3. 🎭Marketing chameleon26.4%
  4. 🦴Fossil in amber21.7%

Tin-foil hat reactor

1.3%

How big a global conspiracy the claim needs.

12345

Paranoia level 1/5 · No conspiracy needed