Graphology

Claim: Graphology can determine a person's personality traits, abilities, and psychological profile through the analysis of their handwriting.

Compare

Bullshit Meter

Pure ontological fiction, excluding real psychological effects.

75.4%
Hard empirical modelHeuristicHybrid pseudosciencePure fiction

Physics vs. mind loop

Does it work in the physical world, or only through belief and behaviour?

Physical world11.7%
Mind & behaviour19.4%

Neither physically real nor a meaningful psychological loop.

Bio & cult hazard

12.5%

Risk of abandoning medicine and of getting trapped in a closed group.

☣ Medical risk12.5%
🔒 Cult isolation5.2%

Topological fingerprint

The structural profile of the claim on five axes.

Empirical rigorMagic & dogmaRhetorical fogConspiracyPsychosocial
Empirical rigor
11.1%
Magic & dogma
33.0%
Rhetorical fog
51.9%
Conspiracy
1.6%
Psychosocial
19.8%
Compare with

Ockham's guillotine

What remains after cutting away the unfalsifiable superstructure.

Hard core1.4%
Common sense16.8%
Pure ritual81.5%
Empty negation0.3%

Scam & grift

31.9%

How much it works as a money-extraction funnel.

1. Bait70.2%
2. Guru dependence12.2%
3. Blaming the client1.9%

Fog & Barnum

59.7%

Protection from refutation through vagueness and stolen jargon.

Energy, frequency, vibration, quantum alignment, natural harmony, ancient wisdom, holistic balance…

  • Barnum effect68.2%
  • Motte-and-bailey18.9%
  • Stolen jargon4.3%

Guru roulette

88.4%

Does the result depend on who performs it?

☀☂⚡?☾

Repeatability between operators: 11.6%

  • Special gift needed12.2%
  • Contradicting experts75.5%
  • "Skeptics block it"0.8%

Fossil & dogma clock

96.1%

Does the field correct its errors, or is it frozen?

  1. 🚀Active science2.3%
  2. 🩹Degenerative patching59.9%
  3. 🎭Marketing chameleon10.6%
  4. 🦴Fossil in amber27.2%

Tin-foil hat reactor

2.0%

How big a global conspiracy the claim needs.

12345

Paranoia level 1/5 · No conspiracy needed