Feng Shui

Claim: Harmonizing spatial arrangement and orientation in accordance with the flow of qi promotes positive energy, health, and prosperity.

FOLKLORE + ERGONOMICS Worldwide#feng-shui#geomancy#energy
Compare

Bullshit Meter

Pure ontological fiction, excluding real psychological effects.

76.7%
Hard empirical modelHeuristicHybrid pseudosciencePure fiction

Physics vs. mind loop

Does it work in the physical world, or only through belief and behaviour?

Physical world0.5%
Mind & behaviour28.6%

Neither physically real nor a meaningful psychological loop.

Bio & cult hazard

21.6%

Risk of abandoning medicine and of getting trapped in a closed group.

☣ Medical risk21.6%
🔒 Cult isolation10.9%

Topological fingerprint

The structural profile of the claim on five axes.

Empirical rigorMagic & dogmaRhetorical fogConspiracyPsychosocial
Empirical rigor
1.9%
Magic & dogma
75.3%
Rhetorical fog
44.9%
Conspiracy
1.2%
Psychosocial
34.0%
Compare with

Ockham's guillotine

What remains after cutting away the unfalsifiable superstructure.

Hard core0.7%
Common sense69.7%
Pure ritual28.7%
Empty negation0.9%

Scam & grift

14.7%

How much it works as a money-extraction funnel.

1. Bait64.0%
2. Guru dependence49.1%
3. Blaming the client22.5%

Fog & Barnum

67.9%

Protection from refutation through vagueness and stolen jargon.

Energy, frequency, vibration, quantum alignment, natural harmony, ancient wisdom, holistic balance…

  • Barnum effect29.8%
  • Motte-and-bailey34.5%
  • Stolen jargon34.5%

Guru roulette

96.6%

Does the result depend on who performs it?

☀☂⚡?☾

Repeatability between operators: 3.4%

  • Special gift needed49.1%
  • Contradicting experts44.5%
  • "Skeptics block it"2.9%

Fossil & dogma clock

97.2%

Does the field correct its errors, or is it frozen?

  1. 🚀Active science1.4%
  2. 🩹Degenerative patching15.1%
  3. 🎭Marketing chameleon2.8%
  4. 🦴Fossil in amber80.7%

Tin-foil hat reactor

1.3%

How big a global conspiracy the claim needs.

12345

Paranoia level 1/5 · No conspiracy needed