Copper Bracelets for Arthritis

Claim: Wearing copper bracelets treats and relieves the symptoms of arthritis and rheumatism.

Compare

Bullshit Meter

Pure ontological fiction, excluding real psychological effects.

77.7%
Hard empirical modelHeuristicHybrid pseudosciencePure fiction

Physics vs. mind loop

Does it work in the physical world, or only through belief and behaviour?

Physical world12.5%
Mind & behaviour10.5%

Neither physically real nor a meaningful psychological loop.

Bio & cult hazard

40.3%

Risk of abandoning medicine and of getting trapped in a closed group.

☣ Medical risk40.3%
🔒 Cult isolation5.4%

Topological fingerprint

The structural profile of the claim on five axes.

Empirical rigorMagic & dogmaRhetorical fogConspiracyPsychosocial
Empirical rigor
17.9%
Magic & dogma
47.1%
Rhetorical fog
28.5%
Conspiracy
3.5%
Psychosocial
11.1%
Compare with

Ockham's guillotine

What remains after cutting away the unfalsifiable superstructure.

Hard core0.5%
Common sense13.1%
Pure ritual85.7%
Empty negation0.6%

Scam & grift

30.1%

How much it works as a money-extraction funnel.

1. Bait49.1%
2. Guru dependence26.4%
3. Blaming the client13.6%

Fog & Barnum

50.5%

Protection from refutation through vagueness and stolen jargon.

Energy, frequency, vibration, quantum alignment, natural harmony, ancient wisdom, holistic balance…

  • Barnum effect28.6%
  • Motte-and-bailey42.4%
  • Stolen jargon23.4%

Guru roulette

44.7%

Does the result depend on who performs it?

✓✓✓✓✓

Repeatability between operators: 55.3%

  • Special gift needed26.4%
  • Contradicting experts13.2%
  • "Skeptics block it"5.2%

Fossil & dogma clock

96.5%

Does the field correct its errors, or is it frozen?

  1. 🚀Active science2.4%
  2. 🩹Degenerative patching22.9%
  3. 🎭Marketing chameleon21.8%
  4. 🦴Fossil in amber53.0%

Tin-foil hat reactor

4.2%

How big a global conspiracy the claim needs.

12345

Paranoia level 1/5 · No conspiracy needed