Colloidal Silver

Claim: Colloidal silver acts as a powerful natural antibiotic and remedy capable of treating diverse infections and promoting overall health.

Compare

Bullshit Meter

Pure ontological fiction, excluding real psychological effects.

70.6%
Hard empirical modelHeuristicHybrid pseudosciencePure fiction

Physics vs. mind loop

Does it work in the physical world, or only through belief and behaviour?

Physical world36.2%
Mind & behaviour3.0%

Neither physically real nor a meaningful psychological loop.

Bio & cult hazard

61.7%

Risk of abandoning medicine and of getting trapped in a closed group.

☣ Medical risk61.7%
🔒 Cult isolation2.8%

Topological fingerprint

The structural profile of the claim on five axes.

Empirical rigorMagic & dogmaRhetorical fogConspiracyPsychosocial
Empirical rigor
21.8%
Magic & dogma
22.0%
Rhetorical fog
34.8%
Conspiracy
16.5%
Psychosocial
7.5%
Compare with

Ockham's guillotine

What remains after cutting away the unfalsifiable superstructure.

Hard core1.5%
Common sense14.1%
Pure ritual79.6%
Empty negation4.8%

Scam & grift

18.6%

How much it works as a money-extraction funnel.

1. Bait32.5%
2. Guru dependence20.9%
3. Blaming the client4.5%

Fog & Barnum

55.5%

Protection from refutation through vagueness and stolen jargon.

Energy, frequency, vibration, quantum alignment, natural harmony, ancient wisdom, holistic balance…

  • Barnum effect35.9%
  • Motte-and-bailey29.5%
  • Stolen jargon32.5%

Guru roulette

51.6%

Does the result depend on who performs it?

☀☂⚡?☾

Repeatability between operators: 48.4%

  • Special gift needed20.9%
  • Contradicting experts28.1%
  • "Skeptics block it"2.5%

Fossil & dogma clock

97.6%

Does the field correct its errors, or is it frozen?

  1. 🚀Active science2.0%
  2. 🩹Degenerative patching37.1%
  3. 🎭Marketing chameleon37.1%
  4. 🦴Fossil in amber23.8%

Tin-foil hat reactor

19.0%

How big a global conspiracy the claim needs.

12345

Paranoia level 1/5 · No conspiracy needed