Astrology

Claim: Astrology claims that the relative positions and movements of celestial bodies influence human affairs, personality traits, and terrestrial events.

COMMERCIAL QUACKERY Worldwide#astrology#horoscope#zodiac
Compare

Bullshit Meter

Pure ontological fiction, excluding real psychological effects.

96.2%
Hard empirical modelHeuristicHybrid pseudosciencePure fiction

Physics vs. mind loop

Does it work in the physical world, or only through belief and behaviour?

Physical world0.9%
Mind & behaviour3.6%

Neither physically real nor a meaningful psychological loop.

Bio & cult hazard

18.1%

Risk of abandoning medicine and of getting trapped in a closed group.

☣ Medical risk18.1%
🔒 Cult isolation11.7%

Topological fingerprint

The structural profile of the claim on five axes.

Empirical rigorMagic & dogmaRhetorical fogConspiracyPsychosocial
Empirical rigor
2.0%
Magic & dogma
57.8%
Rhetorical fog
63.0%
Conspiracy
1.1%
Psychosocial
2.9%
Compare with

Ockham's guillotine

What remains after cutting away the unfalsifiable superstructure.

Hard core0.8%
Common sense3.5%
Pure ritual95.0%
Empty negation0.7%

Scam & grift

36.3%

How much it works as a money-extraction funnel.

1. Bait59.2%
2. Guru dependence25.7%
3. Blaming the client4.5%

Fog & Barnum

75.3%

Protection from refutation through vagueness and stolen jargon.

Energy, frequency, vibration, quantum alignment, natural harmony, ancient wisdom, holistic balance…

  • Barnum effect61.6%
  • Motte-and-bailey30.9%
  • Stolen jargon6.1%

Guru roulette

95.9%

Does the result depend on who performs it?

☀☂⚡?☾

Repeatability between operators: 4.1%

  • Special gift needed25.7%
  • Contradicting experts68.9%
  • "Skeptics block it"1.3%

Fossil & dogma clock

97.7%

Does the field correct its errors, or is it frozen?

  1. 🚀Active science2.2%
  2. 🩹Degenerative patching41.1%
  3. 🎭Marketing chameleon6.6%
  4. 🦴Fossil in amber50.1%

Tin-foil hat reactor

1.2%

How big a global conspiracy the claim needs.

12345

Paranoia level 1/5 · No conspiracy needed