Astrological Compatibility

Claim: Astrological signs and birth charts can determine romantic compatibility and guide personal relationship decisions.

COMMERCIAL QUACKERY Worldwide#astrology#horoscopes#relationships
Compare

Bullshit Meter

Pure ontological fiction, excluding real psychological effects.

90.4%
Hard empirical modelHeuristicHybrid pseudosciencePure fiction

Physics vs. mind loop

Does it work in the physical world, or only through belief and behaviour?

Physical world0.5%
Mind & behaviour24.7%

Neither physically real nor a meaningful psychological loop.

Bio & cult hazard

10.7%

Risk of abandoning medicine and of getting trapped in a closed group.

☣ Medical risk10.7%
🔒 Cult isolation7.6%

Topological fingerprint

The structural profile of the claim on five axes.

Empirical rigorMagic & dogmaRhetorical fogConspiracyPsychosocial
Empirical rigor
1.9%
Magic & dogma
61.8%
Rhetorical fog
70.3%
Conspiracy
0.9%
Psychosocial
11.1%
Compare with

Ockham's guillotine

What remains after cutting away the unfalsifiable superstructure.

Hard core0.3%
Common sense5.9%
Pure ritual93.7%
Empty negation0.2%

Scam & grift

45.9%

How much it works as a money-extraction funnel.

1. Bait76.9%
2. Guru dependence30.1%
3. Blaming the client7.7%

Fog & Barnum

78.5%

Protection from refutation through vagueness and stolen jargon.

Energy, frequency, vibration, quantum alignment, natural harmony, ancient wisdom, holistic balance…

  • Barnum effect74.3%
  • Motte-and-bailey20.6%
  • Stolen jargon4.0%

Guru roulette

97.6%

Does the result depend on who performs it?

☀☂⚡?☾

Repeatability between operators: 2.4%

  • Special gift needed30.1%
  • Contradicting experts66.4%
  • "Skeptics block it"1.1%

Fossil & dogma clock

97.0%

Does the field correct its errors, or is it frozen?

  1. 🚀Active science2.4%
  2. 🩹Degenerative patching29.3%
  3. 🎭Marketing chameleon9.9%
  4. 🦴Fossil in amber58.5%

Tin-foil hat reactor

1.1%

How big a global conspiracy the claim needs.

12345

Paranoia level 1/5 · No conspiracy needed